That’s a really good question, and I’m glad you ask. I can see why some people would be confused about Non-VBV transactions since most people are used to OTP and Verified by Visa. Non-VBV means the payment goes through without those checks. But, the explanation does NOT excuse them as a payment protection system, and THAT is the problem with Non-VBV payments. Fewer checks can mean more fraudulent transactions and chargebacks.
From a customer’s viewpoint, it means more chances of unauthorized payments. As for merchants, it means a chargeback and potential loss of the product. As for 2025, payment systems are much stronger, and that is true for systems with EMV 3-D Secure and multi-factorauthentication. However, it is NOT the ban on Non-VBV transactions, and that is why it is crucial for customers and merchants alike to understand the potential risks and try to take a more balanced approach.
Great job in your article. I think it does a nice job of opening up this discussion, and it is something more people should be aware of.